Genly and Estraven Characters from ‘The Left Hand of Darkness’ by Ursula K. Le Guin

This Resource is for Year 11 English students studying in the Victorian VCE Curriculum.

Image result for left hand of darkness imagesLook carefully at the similarities and differences between the two main characters Genly Ai and Therem Harth Rem Ir Estraven in Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Left Hand of Darkness.  The list of differences and similarities between the two characters is from my interpretation only and therefore could be added to by students who develop their own interpretation of Genly and Estraven.

For ease of writing I call Genly Ai (Genly) and Therem Harth Rem Ir Estraven (Estraven) in the notes below.

Estraven and Genly Ai

Genly Ai

Genly’s Differences from Estraven

  • Genly Ai is from Terra (Earth), almost 30 years old
  • 1st Envoy from the Ekumen to recruit the planet Gethen to the Ekumen to become part of a universal and mystical trade venture of planets
  • Different physical characteristics – tall, black skin, strong, less hair, large hands, not built for cold
  • Stereotypical male – heterosexual, sexually active all the time considered a ‘pervert’ by Gethenians
  • Has been in Karhide for 2 years in an attempt to gain favour with King Argaven and convince him and Karhide to join the Ekumen
  • Inability to trust and uncertainty factors influence his decisions & fear of the unknown
  • Gender fear of difference especially the feminine traits of Gethenians which he sees as negative traits
  • Non believer in androgynous Gethenians, can’t comprehend their reactions or faces that he sees as not human but like animals – cat, seal, an otter
  • Often is impatient, quick to despair and then to rejoice
  • Lacks insight to understand and seen as an alien in Gethen is not to be trusted
  • Has trouble communicating and understanding the intricate subtleties of ‘shifgrethor’
  • Unaware of other people’s motives especially Estraven
  • Does not have the qualities of the Handdara in regards to intuition or ‘nusuth’
  • Struggles with too much yang in order to create harmony at the beginning of the novel
  • Effectively in terms of dualism, Genly is the ‘right hand’ of Estraven (Le Guin stresses that each yang contains it’s yin, each yin contains it’s yang)

Genly’s Similarities with Estraven

  • Believes in the mission to persuade the inhabitants of Gethen to join the Ekumen for the purpose of expanding trade and interplanetary alliance
  • Even though Genly has been on Gethen for 2 years he does not give up trying to carry out his mission
  • This is similar to Estraven in his continued mission to join Gethen with the Ekumen as he believes in the benefits of uniting his planet with other worlds even if it means exile
  • Genly is loyal, honourable and idealistic like Estraven
  • They both have sacrificed a lot for their ambitions but see the big picture of helping humanity
  • Both are in exile, Genly from his planet and Estraven from his home of Estre
  • On the Gobrin Ice they both pull together for survival
  • On the Gobrin Ice Genly transforms and understands the significance of the yin and yang in Estraven and the importance of harmony as a whole person
  • Therefore Genly finally accepts Estraven as an androgynous person not as male/female but as one
  • The relationship of Genly with Estraven is described by Le Guin as ‘profound love’ and one that changes Genly

Therem Harth Rem Ir Estraven

Estraven’s Differences from Genly

  • Estraven is from the Domain of Estre in Kerm land, a southern end of Karhide on the planet Gethen (age not sure)
  • Prime Minister of Karhide at the start of the novel
  • Different physical characteristics – stocky, dark, with a layer of fat to protect against the cold, black eyes and sleek hair
  • He is an androgyne, neither male nor female but both, as are all Gethenians
  • Typical androgyne goes into kemmer
  • Had a son Sorve to his brother Arek and swore a ‘vow of faithfulness’ to Arek
  • He had a kemmering with Ashe and they had 2 sons
  • His personal life has been steeped in profound and tumultuous human emotions, involving love and death, which feed his soul
  • He is honest, quick minded, wise, versatile and adaptable, courageous, creative in responding to new situations, a shrewd politician, powerful, aggressive when needed & constantly pushing forward
  • He has a strength of character and diplomacy by preventing Karhide and Orgoreyn from going to war over the Sinnoth Valley dispute
  • Has highly trained skills of the Handdara which makes him respond intuitively doing no more or no less than what is required
  • His spiritualism is an important part of his character
  • He praises ‘darkness’ when it comes and it’s counterpart ‘light’
  • He is not moved by personal desire, interest or advantage and acts spontaneously in accordance with his true nature as the quality of the Handdara teaches
  • He uses his feminine intuition as a good quality and has perfected the balance of yin and yang in his harmonious actions which demonstrates that both male and female characteristics are necessary for survival
  • Effectively Estraven is the ‘left hand’ of Genly and without Estraven, Genly would not have been able to undertake his transformation of character that leads him to a deeper understanding of Gethenians and himself
  • Estraven is willing to sacrifice his life to achieve the success of the mission and the good of the whole world

Estraven’s Similarities with Genly

  • Believes in Genly’s mission to persuade the inhabitants of Gethen to join the Ekumen for the purpose of expanding trade and interplanetary alliance
  • Estraven continues his belief in the mission to join Gethen with the Ekumen as he believes in the benefits of uniting his planet with other worlds even if it means his exile
  • Both are in exile, Genly from his planet and Estraven from his home of Estre
  • Estraven is loyal, honourable and idealistic like Genly
  • They both have sacrificed a lot for their ambitions but see the big picture of helping humanity
  • On the Gobrin Ice they both pull together for survival
  • Accepts Genly as different, but it is the likeness, the wholeness that he understands and the importance of harmony
  • The relationship of Estraven with Genly is described by Le Guin as ‘profound love’ and one that embodies Genly’s physical as well as spiritual journey to greater self knowledge and understanding

Online Tutoring of English Using Zoom

How to Analyse a Cartoon for Language Analysis

This Resource is for Years 10/11/12 Mainstream English students studying Analysing and Exploring Argument in the Victorian Curriculum.

Just as writers and speakers use techniques such as exaggeration, tone and emotive language to manipulate and position readers, so too can cartoonists use many highly persuasive techniques. 

Use the same questioning techniques for analysing cartoons as you do for analysing articles. Ask What / How / Why the author uses his/her language with the intention to persuade the audience to Think (Logos) / Feel (Pathos) / Do something (Ethos).

Snoopy loves very much reading books by BradSnoopy97 on DeviantArt

When analysing a cartoon, ask yourself the following questions:

  • What is the main point of the cartoon?  Does the cartoon align with the author’s point of view on the issue in the article you are also analysing? Be mindful, if the cartoon is a stand-alone, it may have its own point of view that is either the same or different to the article.
  • What is the issue being represented?  What is the context of this issue?
  • Who is the target audience the cartoon creator is aiming for?  What is the intended impact/effect of the cartoon on the reader/audience?
  • Who are the central figures/characters?  What are they doing or saying?  How are they represented?  For example, a cartoonist may represent members of a group as similar to make a point about their powerlessness, their loss of identity, their mindlessness and so on.  Sometimes animals are used to represent humans in order to critique behaviour or an individual’s point of view.
  • What visual strategies are used to persuade the audience to agree with the point of view presented?  Look at:
  • Composition of cartoon – number of items/subjects and their position within the text and in relation to one another
  • Size of cartoon and characters in connection with composition – are the characters exaggerated
  • Layout of fonts used in text – can often use small text but big heads on characters to exaggerate the sarcastic tone
  • Colours and shade – what do the colours symbolise
    • Black = evil/power/death
    • White = purity/simplicity/cleanliness
    • Red = warmth/comfort/anger/embarrassment
    • Yellow = cheeriness/frustration/attention seeking
    • Blue = calmness/tranquillity/sadness/misery
    • Purple = royalty/wealth/wisdom
    • Green = calm/tranquillity/nature/envy
    • Brown = earth/nature/strength/security
    • Red+blue+white = flags symbolise patriotism
  • The focus and emphasis – where is the reader’s attention drawn to first
  • Labelling and stereotypes – often characters are stereotypical ie. blond, blue eyed, suntanned, muscular lifesaver is supposed to be typical Australian male but it is not accurate representation
  • Speech bubbles, dialogue, body text can often state contention or reinforce issue
  • Loaded language – language that has a deeper meaning than is shown on the surface
  • Captions – words outside frame of text can state contention, what do they add and how do they persuade
  • Symbols, motifs, icons – images that represent the ideas or concepts, can appeal to the audience
  • Angles used and white space ie. blank space left – can draw audience away towards some text to make a further impact on the issue or detract from it
  • Obvious tone ie political cartoons are often humorous and sarcastic (use verbal irony)
  • Facial expressions – how do the characters expressions compare to one another, are they expressions we would expect
  • Context to main issue – does the cartoon support or oppose the main issue
  • What is significant about the background and foreground of the cartoon?
  • When writing your analysis discuss how the visual language comments on the issue and how the cartoon creator positions the audience by using the visual techniques.  Keeping in mind what the creator’s purpose is and how the cartoonist wants to position the reader – to think (logos) / feel (pathos) / do something (ethos)

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum

Photograph 51 and My Brilliant Career The Basics

This Resource is for Year 12 English students studying Unit 4 AOS:1 Reading & Comparing Texts in the Victorian VCE Curriculum for 2023.  While Photograph 51 by Anna Ziegler was compared in 2022 to The Penelopiad by Margaret Atwood, the play has a new comparative text in 2023, the novel My Brilliant Career by Miles Franklin.

Introduction

Anna Ziegler’s play ‘Photograph 51’ and Miles Franklin’s novel ‘My Brilliant Career’ explore concepts with very different women protagonists.  Both protagonists have their own individual personalities, dispositions, ages and external contexts.  As such it is important to understand the cultural and social surroundings of each character as well as how they are affected by other people and their settings.  In ‘My Brilliant Career’ the characters are all seen in relation to Sybylla Melvyn because it is her ‘yarn’ and so the story unfolds based on her whims and experiences.  Within ‘Photograph 51’, Rosalind Franklin is stripped of participation in the narrative and seems completely unaware of her significance or importance to her society or its later historical record of her achievements.

The Historical and Cultural Context of Both Texts is Important in Comparing Them

‘Photograph 51’ is based on the modern viewpoint of Anna Ziegler and her interest in feminist and historical ideas that reconceptualise key events in history.  The play’s historical context is based around the results of post WWII and movements in the 1950’s scientific world.  ‘Photograph 51’ is a single act play with its action occurring between 1951 and 1953 at a time in Britain when there was a pervasive attitude that a woman’s place was better served in the home than having a career, along with an entrenched gender bias which had tragic consequences for Rosalind Franklin.

‘My Brilliant Career’ was written by Stella Maria Miles Franklin an Australian writer who wrote her novel in 1899 and it was not published until 1901 the year of the Australian Federation.  The novel’s historical context of Australia’s Federation plays a huge role in the narrative that describes a masculine society with aspects of Australian rural life that that held women in a constricting place.  While Ziegler’s play is feminist in its nature, Franklin’s novel is proto-feminist because it comes before the first feminist movements began.  Franklin’s novel was written 7 years before women had the right to vote and they still lacked social and economic prospects.  Franklin has Sybylla reflect that “… it was only men who could take the world by its ears and conquer their fate …” (p.61). 

Both Texts Explore Ideas About

  1. Power in its various forms, including patriarchal power within society of financial, political and legal power; physical and intellectual power.
  2. Identity and its connections with physical appearance, self-perception and the expectations of others.
  3. Women’s roles/gender are shown in differing representations of the feminine in various types of characters but because both Sybylla and Rosalind were independent and intelligent, neither one conformed to social expectations about gender and destiny.
  4. Storytelling and the power of narrative is demonstrated in the power of taking control of one’s own story.  In My Brilliant Career it is Sybylla’s own voice that exposes gender inequality in 19th century Australia and her simple ‘yarn’ becomes other Australian women’s stories of restrictive conformation to society’s standards.  However, Rosalind in Photograph 51 who is isolated and vilified, is unable to take control of her narrative.
  5. Truth and Lies is shown in Zeigler’s play suggests that it does matter who found the answer to DNA with Wilkin’s tacit approval of Crick and Watson’s use of Rosalind’s research data is shown in his comment that it doesn’t matter who found the answer.  Sybylla narrates her own story that seeks her own personal truth as to how she wants to live her life, knowing that because she is a girl, and ugly at that, her ambitions are continually thwarted.
  6. Ambition for Sybylla is boundless and no matter how hard she tries to fit in to her socially acceptable female role she always longs for the “mystical better things” (p.65) in her wish to achieve something.  Rosalind’s ambition is equally intense and her determination and desire to do her scientific work with her personal challenge to be “always right” (p.46), drove her to become a scientist who paid meticulous attention to detail.
  7. Respect for Rosalind is being treated with a level of importance by her male colleagues for the significant work she did for discovery of DNA and being worthy of respect.  Unfortunately only Gosling and Caspar truly respect Rosalind but she is disrespected throughout the narrative by the other hypocritical male scientists.  With Sybylla’s story a coming of age narrative, respect for and of others is part of her development as she is coming to terms with her true values.  Aunt Helen is the only person Sybylla respects; in contrast she loses respect for her father when he drinks and destroys the family’s financial security.
  8. Expectations fall into 3 categories for Sybylla – first, societal expectations of Australia in the 1890’s, second her personal desires balanced against what is expected of her in terms of propriety and correct moral and social behaviour and third a feminist concern of hope for women in a world made for men.  While Rosalind looks back reflects on her desires to live with decisions she has made otherwise she dies in “regret” (p.83) but Sybylla looks forward with expectation, tempered with uncertainty, still seeking independence in an unknown future.

Photograph 51 by Anna Ziegler

Structure & Style

As a single act play, it includes six characters each of whom presents their perspective on events unfolding between 1951 and 1953 at King’s College, London.  There is a juxtaposition of the past and present which interrupts the linear structure of the narrative.  The action of Ziegler’s play mainly focuses upon Dr Rosalind Franklin, a real-life scientist who is arguably the person who discovered the molecular structure of DNA.  Her research was crucial to the three men who would ultimately be awarded the coveted Nobel Prize in 1962.  Ziegler’s characters are therefore all real people; however, she freely admits to altering the time structure of events, re-arranging facts and creating interactions between characters that allow her to creatively explore the main themes of the play.

‘Photograph 51’ is structured as a circular narrative, not quite from the start but as Franklin and Wilkins return to Shakespeare’s A Winter’s Tale at the play’s conclusion, our minds are taken back to their discussion of the play that first occurs.  This doubling effect, or repetition, brings to mind one of the key symbols of the play, the double helix.  Ziegler, as she wants her audience to view events from different perspectives, also ‘relies on characters stepping forward occasionally as a sort of Greek chorus to fill in the background details’.  This is often found in the voice of Caspar who questions the behaviour of Wilkins, Watson and Crick about what really happened.  There are no traditional scene changes but the play looks to alterations in lighting and character groupings to suggest structural shifts.  The action of the play is fluid moving with characters all having equal speaking parts like an ensemble piece. 

Ziegler’s stage directions also indicate to the audience when she is instructing one of her characters to break the fourth wall (talk directly to the audience).  An example is Rosalind’s line: ‘(To the audience.)  I have two tumours.’  With the spotlight on her as she says these words, only the audience is meant to hear.

Feminist Literature & Challenging the Historical Invisibility of Women

The idea of challenging the historical invisibility of women is implicit in the play where the work of an extraordinary woman Rosalind Franklin is made visible.  Ziegler’s play highlights the ways in which stories told by men have worked to minimise or downplay the roles played by women.  According to Watson Rosalind “misunderstood the terms of her contract” (p.13) when in fact crucial details are “changed” after her arrival.  As readers we hope that had Rosalind Franklin lived long enough the Nobel Prize Committee would have surely awarded her a Nobel prize for her conceptual understanding of the structure of the DNA molecule.  However, Ziegler’s play recognises Franklin’s contribution even if the sexist attitudes ingrained in science at the time did not.

When asked about Rosalind Franklin as a feminist, Ziegler argued that was not her intention but audiences may interpret the character differently: ‘But more importantly, I agree that Rosalind wouldn’t want to be considered a feminist icon and I didn’t set out to make her into one.  All I can say is that, if the play has contributed to that sense of her, I hope it’s not because it paints her as a victim, but because it shows that she persevered in the name of the work and the work alone at a time when she had to ignore that it was difficult for her to do so.’

My Brilliant Career by Miles Franklin

My Brilliant Career: Text Classics  by Miles Franklin at Abbey's Bookshop,

Structure & Style

The novel ‘My Brilliant Career’ has a conventional linear structure with Sybylla’s voice telling her own personal growth story during 19th century rural Australia.  Using a male pseudonym Franklin wrote her story of a young woman who was held back socially by a strict patriarchal society.  The novel includes an Introduction by Jennifer Byrne (vii-xiv) followed by a Preface by Henry Lawson and a further Introduction by Sybylla (pp.1-3) then the novel extends across 38 chapters.  Each voice is of Sybylla’s own perspective of the contrasts between the settings from Bruggabrong, Possum Gully, Caddagat, Five Bob Downs and Barney’s Gap. 

The diametrically opposed physical spaces of Caddagat and Barney’s Gap echo the oppositional forces in Sybylla herself (the feminine and the tomboy), and parallel opposing genres of romanticism and realism in the novel.  What is important to note is the Federation Drought of the 1890’s that caused enormous stock losses and many landowners became bankrupt.  The economic depression was a tumultuous time for the young states of Australia with banks failing and unemployment soaring. Sybylla’s novel provides a palpable insight into the terrible conditions of the time along with her descriptions of the harsh weather of “scorching furnace-breath winds [that] shrivelled every blade of grass, dust and the moan of starving stock filled the air” (p.33).

Proto-feminist Novel Challenges Gender Expectations in 19th Century Australia

At a time when it was considered that the only suitable ambition for young women was to marry and raise a family, Franklin has Sybylla set out of the norm and desire to have a career and wish to live an independent life.  In effect, Franklin gives her main protagonist a voice equal to her own abilities.  In Sybylla’s own Introduction (p.1-3) she describes her manuscript as a “real yarn” (p.1) addressing her readers as ‘My Dear Fellow Australians’ (p.1) grouping women and men together under one banner and wanting to be heard.

From a young age Sybylla has a desire to write and throughout her narrative she expresses her opinion of marriage, redefines class boundaries and her completely different views of what was expected of ladies of her time.  Describing herself as “unorthodox” (p.215) Sybylla is seen as different from the norm and at times does perform many “self-analysis” sessions on herself with one of her biggest regrets is that she is ugly.  Forced to acknowledge she is not like the beautiful girls who choose the acceptable pathway of marriage, Sybylla knows she is in a different “sphere” (p.61) intellectually, because her desire is to have a career.  Yet she is also egalitarian seeing herself as an “Australian peasant, cheerful, honest and brave” (p.391).

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum

Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel: The Basics

This Resource is ‘A Brief Synopsis’ only for Mainstream English Year 12 Students studying Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel in AOS1, Unit 3: Analytical Study in the VCE Victorian Curriculum.

Introduction

Instead of Covid-19, Station Eleven’s world is devastated by the ‘Georgia Flu’.  The fictional plague is more deadly and contagious than Covid-19; this flu virus kills 99% of the earth’s population in a matter of weeks.  We, as readers, can see certain parallels with the pandemic that engulfs the world today, such as hoarding of groceries in the early days of Covid-19, overrun hospital emergency departments, face masks and the idea of some similarity to Station Eleven.  Life imitating art.

Yet Station Eleven’s world is a story of complete collapse of civilisation and a rebirth in a world of survivors who are devoid of doctors, countries, communities, no technology and where luck or fate picks who lives or dies.  Children learn to kill or be killed within an ever-thrumming baseline of danger.

However, Emily St. John Mandel’s novel Station Eleven is ‘speculative fiction’ that if there were a doomsday event, there may initially be a period of chaotic social collapse, but gradually the surviving people would organise themselves into communities akin to our contemporary civil society.  Mandel worries that the civilisation we take for granted is fragile and vulnerable, and ‘could fail quite easily’, but she harbours ‘a possibly naïve but stubborn notion that the overwhelming majority of people on earth really just want to live peacefully and raise their kids and go about their business with a minimum of fear and insecurity.’

Emily St. John Mandel

Civilisation in a Post-pandemic World

While Mandel’s central thematic ideas are of truth, hope, love and moral courage, she leaves readers with something positive rather than negative.  The characters are more often inspired by art, knowledge and concern for others than by fear, superficial ideas, authoritarianism or self-interest.  The novel values: trusting rather than controlling others; connecting with and paying attention to each other rather than pursuing the illusory thrills of self-promotion and fame; and above all, creating rather than destroying.  We see how interconnectivity both creates and dismantles civilisation.

Pivotal in the novel’s network of characters is the celebrity actor Arthur Leander, while the ‘Georgia Flu’ provides the pivotal moment of world-wide ‘collapse’ in a narrative timeline which, although presented non-chronologically, spans five decades.  Arthur is performing as King Lear in Toronto’s Elgin Theatre when he, and within days the whole society, collapses.  After this apocalypse, we follow Kirsten and her companions in the Travelling Symphony, Clark who becomes a museum curator in the airport lounge, and Jeevan the paramedic who eventually lives with his family in a community in Virginia.  Readers gradually build a picture of the three decades preceding the apocalypse, as well as the two decades after it, piecing together as the narrative takes us back and forward in time the network of relationships among Arthur, his first wife Miranda, his other wives, his friend Clark, his putative rescuer and erstwhile paparazzo Jeevan, and his son Tyler’s future nemesis, Kirsten.

Perspective on the Text

Emily St. John Mandel’s novel invites readers, not so much to fear doomsday and its dystopian aftermath, as to think about what we truly value in the society we currently inhabit.  Each of Mandel’s main characters represents the good in humanity; each of them is engaged in work that either cares for others and builds community or creates art that shows ‘the best of the world’.  Kirsten, Clark, Miranda, Jeevan, even Arthur, each is honest, creative, and selfless yet strong, even though they are also being human but flawed in some way.

Structure of the Text

Mandel’s non-chronological narrative pivots around the moment of Arthur’s (and the world’s) collapse.  Whilst the narrative point of view is generally omniscient, or third person, readers frequently have access to the thoughts of a character, Miranda, Clark, Jeevan or Kirsten.  The reader becomes aware, after a while, that the non-linear recursive structure reflects the nature of memory.  The plot unfurls across not only timelines but characters and Miranda’s comic book ‘Dr Eleven’ is the portkey that reveals the tangled web we weave of life.

The Importance of the Arts and Sciences

With Miranda’s art (Dr Eleven Comics) as its central motif, the novel highlights the importance in society of both the humanities and the sciences.  We see Mandel’s characters devoting themselves to visual and performing arts because these show the best of a society, and to writing, history and the media because by keeping records of the past, humans have a hope of understanding the present and doing better in the future.  We see the characters remembering electricity and aeroplanes, and hoping for the resurgence of these lost wonders of the world since they represent high points in humankind’s scientific knowledge.

Issues and Themes
Survival is insufficient / survival is arbitrary / human instinctContagion & disasters / death/ violence & abuse in a tarnished new world / fearSociety & the individual / communitarianism versus individualism
Isolation and loneliness versus community connectednessMemory / the self & society/ loss / nostalgia / history / regret / remembering the old world / transience of memoryCreativity / arts / sciences / enduring nature of arts and power to reflect reality
BelongingHope / optimism / luck in a crisisTruth
LoveMoral courageCreating order from chaos
Trust & communityBeauty of life in the old worldReligion
Symbols
Station ElevenThe paperweightShakespeare
The Letters to VictoriaLuli the dog’s nameFlight/aeroplanes
Water imageryDeath imageryVirus as an avenging angel

Analytical Text Response Topics

  1. “Survival is insufficient.” How does Mandel show that there is more to life than mere survival?
  2. “I see you, I see you, I see you.” ‘Miranda, more than other characters in the novel, makes the best of life despite feeling lonely and disconnected.’ Discuss.
  3. To what extent does Station Eleven suggest that a crisis brings out the best in people?
  4. ‘Arthur may be the central character in Mandel’s novel, but he is not the main character.’ Discuss.
  5. ‘Station Eleven suggests that it is better to be inspired by truth and beauty than by success.’ Discuss.
  6. Discuss the roles played by Dr. Eleven and the Museum of Civilisation in Mandel’s novel.
  7. ‘The characters in Station Eleven are sustained by their memories.’ Do you agree?
  8. ‘Station Eleven is more about creativity in the arts and sciences than about a post-pandemic dystopia.’ Do you agree?
  9. ‘Despite the extreme difficulty of their situation, none of the characters succumbs to fear or pessimism.’ Discuss.
  10. ‘The characters in Station Eleven are motivated more by love than fear.’ Discuss.

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum

Nine Days by Toni Jordan: The Basics

This Resource is for students in Year 12 studying ‘Nine Days’ in AOS1: Unit 3, Reading & Creating Texts, Analytical Text Response, in the Victorian VCE 2023 Mainstream English Curriculum

See the source image

Introduction

Written by a contemporary Australian female writer, Toni Jordan’s 2012 novel Nine Days is a celebration of family life in inner city Richmond in Melbourne from 1938 to 2006.  There are nine different narrators who give their insights into nine days over a time span of more than sixty years that includes stories about four generations of one major family (the Westaways).

Topics raised by the novel, include the impact in Australia of the Second World War; suburban life of the time; housing in Richmond during the mid-twentieth century; aspects of social class, religious sectarianism (Catholic–Protestant) antagonism; social customs, norms and attitudes, particularly as these affect women; views about unmarried mothers and babies born out of wedlock; and the industrial nature of Richmond.

At the heart of the narrative is the love story between Jack Husting and Connie Westaway, some details of which are kept secret until the last chapter.  This non-chronological structure of the narrative drives readers to keep going, mimicking life in that it does not always make sense until we look back over it and get the full picture.  Like life too, there is both joy and grief and the ways that characters learn to cope and adapt to changed circumstances.

Structure of the Text

The structure of the novel is not in chronological order, so readers must use the details to piece together the connections.  The novel focuses on nine particular days, mainly around World War II, and has nine different narrators.  The dates of the chapters and narrators are as follows:

Chapter One: Monday 7th August, 1939 = Kip Westaway

Chapter Two: Tuesday 25th September, 2001 = Stanzi Westaway

Chapter Three: Sunday 25th February, 1940 = Jack Husting

Chapter Four: Wednesday 1st August, 1990 = Charlotte Westaway

Chapter Five: Monday 2nd May, 1938 = Francis Westaway

Chapter Six: Saturday 9th November, 1946 = Annabel Crouch

Chapter Seven: Tuesday 14th January, 1941 = Jean Westaway

Chapter Eight: Thursday 27th April, 2006 = Alec Westaway

Chapter Nine: Wednesday 14th August, 1940 = Connie Westaway

Perspective of the Text from the Characters

The novel certainly values the strength of character shown in each generation as characters face the challenges of their time and place, and as they strive to improve their circumstances, and it does this with a light humour.  Familial love is explicitly valued, as is romantic love, although both are represented in different ways by the very different characters involved.  Jean, the mother of Connie, Francis and Kip, shows her love in ways that may be seen as bitter and harsh by the modern reader, but she is fiercely devoted to her aspirations for her family.  Kip represents an ideal form of domestic masculinity, romantically devoted to his wife Annabel for over fifty years, and a loving father to their twin daughters, Charlotte and Stanzi.  The two women of the third generation, idiosyncratic in their differences, ultimately form a very contemporary family, with two mothers (albeit non-gay) for Alec and Libby, who have two different fathers.  Thus, Jordan implicitly values contemporary attitudes about family, sexuality and gender.

Romantic Love

Romantic love is perhaps most poignantly portrayed in the story of Connie and Jack, but with a shocking end.  When Connie is left, after Jack’s departure, with an unplanned pregnancy, no opportunity to get married, and a mother who herself is already familiar with the (illegal) process of procuring an abortion, the novel’s values seem clear.  Its portrayal of Connie bleeding to death on a pavement, and of her brother Kip’s opinions about the importance of contraception, leave us in little doubt that the author values reproductive choice for women, whereas the Catholic Church frowns on contraception, and the State criminalises abortion, both with serious consequences for women.  On the other hand, Charlotte, in the next generation, is free to make the decision not to have an abortion.

Themes

Family and Belonging = Nine Days explores the connections within families, changes over time in what constitutes a family, and our ties to each other.  Through the focus on four different generations of the Westaway family, readers are shown connections over time.  Families are celebrated and valued.

Relationships = The novel highlights family loyalty and obligation, and also shows readers the impact of love, celebrating both young romantic love and the deep attachment of life-long love.  This is particularly seen through the characters of Kip and Annabel, as well as Connie and Jack Husting.

Dealing with Adversity = The novel explores how different characters in different decades struggle with adversity, and how they cope with loss, grief, poverty or loneliness.

Life during WW11 = The novel gives readers insight into the impact of the Second World War on the Melbourne population.

Social Attitudes & Norms Affecting Women = The novel follows the lives of female characters in different eras, and in doing so explores social attitudes and norms affecting women.  Women’s work in both the domestic and public spheres is shown.  Perhaps the most confronting issues the novel explores are about birth control and abortion.  Other challenges faced by the women in the novel include the weight and self-image issues that Stanzi has.

Social Class, Religious Sectarianism & Status = Ada Husting, Jack’s mother, views their family as further up the social ladder than their neighbours, the Westaways.  The Hustings are Protestant business owners, whereas the Westaways are Roman Catholic wage-earners.  The sectarian divisions of the time are also reflected in Jean’s narrative.

Living For the Day = The novel celebrates the notion of living for the day and fully engaging with the people around you.  Because of Kip’s early losses, he develops a kind of life philosophy which he attempts to instil in his daughters.  He immerses himself fully in everyone and everything around him.

Language and Style

Narrative Voice = Because each chapter is narrated by a different character, each has an individual narrative voice that both reflects the character and includes references to the time in which they live. This kind of interior monologue allows us to see the world through the eyes of the narrator, while the dialogue gives us insight into other characters as well.

Humour = A distinctive feature throughout the text, humour is conveyed in both the dialogue and the interior voice of some characters.  The narrative voices of Kip, Alec, Charlotte and Stanzi are particularly light-hearted and humorous.

Symbols

The structure of the novel is held together by several symbols which run through the episodes.  These act as integrating devices and help the reader to recognise family connections, as well as each having an underlying significance.

The Photograph of Connie & Jack = The existence of the photograph is not known till late in the novel that provides a climax to Kip’s narration.  The photo shows the passion between Connie & Jack that never had a chance to flourish but also represents other sweethearts who were separated by war.  It adds to Connie’s sad story that ends in her death through an illegal abortion.

The Shilling = The lucky shilling connects the novel’s different episodes. It is given initially to Kip by Mr Husting, who likes and feels sorry for the cheeky young boy who tends his horse.  He swears Kip to secrecy, knowing his wife would not approve.  From Stanzi in the next chapter, we learn that it is one of her father’s ‘most prized possessions’.

The Amethyst Necklace = Another integrating device is the necklace, which is introduced to readers as a positive symbol in Charlotte’s chapter.  She describes it as ‘my mother’s pendant’ and recounts how she received it for her eighteenth birthday.  In this chapter she uses it for the so-called pendant test, which, according to superstition, indicates a baby’s gender.  But for Charlotte it has a wider significance: she views the pendant as a link to the life of her family and their love.

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum

All The Light We Cannot See by Anthony Doerr: The Basics

All the Light We Cannot See

This Resource is for students in Year 12 studying ‘All The Light We Cannot See’ in AOS1: Unit 3, Reading & Creating Texts, Analytical Text Response, in the Victorian VCE 2023 Mainstream English Curriculum

Introduction

War is a dark event in history

World War II, arguably one of the darkest events of human history, has been the basis of so much writing across so many genres and authors.  Anthony Doerr’s novel alludes to the merciless anonymity of death in war, juxtaposes individualism with collective national mindlessness, and seeks out innocence amidst the brutality of war.

Through the Eyes of 2 Children

Doerr ties the lives and fates of the two protagonists Marie-Laure LeBlanc and Werner Pfennig during the time of World War 11 and readers see through the eyes of these two children even though they are on opposite sides of the war.  He explores how both of them struggle with identity, morality and hope, each in their own way.  Their storylines converge in the bombing of Saint-Malo, demonstrating that war can be indiscriminate in its victims.  War does not care if its victims are children or adults, innocent or guilty, French or German. However, their interaction also speaks to the humanity that lies in all of us, no matter how deeply buried.

Aspects of War & Light in Darkest of Times

The novel explores many aspects of the war, including the destruction, the Occupation of France, the development and training of young boys to become Nazi soldiers, as well as the need to protect the vast items of cultural and national significance, which Hitler was determined to have for the German Nazis.  Doerr encourages readers to consider the ‘light’ that can emerge even in the darkest of times, to remain always morally vigilant and to applaud the bravery of those individuals who resist tyrannical regimes despite the risk to their personal safety.

Hope and Humanity in the Title

The title hints at literal sight, the limitations of the physical sense of sight, the text then suggests the most perceptive characters are blind or have limited sight.  The Frenchman’s repeated plea to ‘open your eyes and see what you can with them before they close forever’ is a reminder of morality.  Humanity is at the heart of the novel, identity, morality and hope shape what it means to be human but characters struggle with all these qualities at the same time.  The focus on war is not about glorifying battles but on praising individuals who have the courage and strength to bear witness to the destruction and not give up hope.

Structure of the Text

Epigraphs

The Novel includes 2 epigraphs at the beginning introducing key themes and situate the text as a work of historical fiction.  The first quote by historian Philip Beck details the destruction of Saint-Malo.  The second from Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels, introduces the idea of the influence of the radio the Nazi’s would not have been able to take power without it.  These epigraphs introduce the idea that scientific knowledge can be deployed for useful purposes but also for senseless destruction.

14 Sections Marked by the Date

The novel contains 14 sections marked by the date to allow the reader to follow the non-chronological narrative.  The first of these is titled ‘Zero’ and is set on 7 August 1944, the key date of the bombardment of Saint-Malo.  Connotations of ‘ground zero’ are suggested by numbering in this manner, and every second section of the novel returns to the key dates of August 7, 8 and 9 when the lives of Marie-Laure, Werner and Von Rumpel intersect. 

Short Chapters with Perspectives of Characters

Within each section are short chapters with deceptively simple titles that provide the reader with key information.  The perspectives of Marie-Laure and Werner are prioritised throughout the novel with their points of view generally alternating to establish the similarities and differences in their experiences.  Other characters narrate chapters to allow readers to understand how people other than the two teenagers were apprehensive about the war and to observe the callousness of those people in the Nazi regime as well as citizens who were willing to collaborate with the enemy for personal gain.

General Plot Overview

Chronologically, we start in 1934, five years before the war.  Marie-Laure is a French girl who lives with her father Daniel Leblanc, working at the Museum of Natural History in Paris.  As she starts to go blind, Daniel teaches her Braille, and makes her wooden models of their neighbourhood to help her navigate.  Six years later, the Nazis invade France, and they flee the capital to find Daniel’s uncle Etienne, who lives in the seaside town of Saint-Malo; Daniel was also tasked with safeguarding a precious gem, the Sea of Flames, from the Nazis.

In Saint-Malo, Daniel also builds Marie-Laure a model of the town, hiding the gem inside.  Meanwhile, she befriends Etienne, who suffers from agoraphobia as a result of the trauma from the First World War.  He is charming and very knowledgeable about science, having made a series of scientific radio broadcasts with his brother Henri (who died in WWI).  She also befriends his cook, Madame Manec, who participates in the resistance movement right up until she falls ill and dies.

Her father is also arrested (and would ultimately die in prison), and the loss of their loved ones prompts both Etienne and Marie-Laure to begin fighting back.  Marie-Laure is also given a key to a grotto by the seaside which is full of molluscs, her favourite kind of animal.

On the other side of the war, Werner is, in 1934, an 8-year-old German boy growing up in an orphanage with his sister Jutta in the small mining town of Zollverein.  They discover a radio, which allows them to listen to a broadcast from miles away (it was Henri and Etienne’s), and Werner learns French to try and understand it.  One day, he repairs the radio of a Nazi official, who recruits him to the Hitler Youth on account of his ingenuity (and his very blonde hair and very blue eyes, considered to be desirable traits by the regime).  Jutta grows increasingly distant from Werner during this time, as she questions the morality of the Nazis.

Werner is trained to be a soldier along with a cohort of other boys, and additionally learns to use radio to locate enemy soldiers.  He befriends Frederick, an innocent boy who was only there because his parents were rich.  Frederick would eventually fall victim to the brutality of the instructors, and Werner tries to quit out of solidarity.  Unfortunately, he is sent into the army to apply his training to actual warfare.  He fights with Frank Volkheimer, a slightly ambiguous character who a tough and cruel soldier, but also displays a capacity to be kind and gentle (including a fondness for classical music). The war eventually takes them to Saint-Malo.

Also, around 1943 or so, a Nazi sergeant, Reinhold von Rumpel, begins to track down the Sea of Flames.  He would have been successful ultimately had it not been for Werner, who stops him in order to save Marie Laure.  As America begins to turn the war around, Werner is arrested and dies after stepping on a German landmine; Marie-Laure and Etienne move back to Paris.  Marie-Laure eventually becomes a scientist specialising in the study of molluscs and has an extensive family of her own by 2014.

Characters

Marie-Laure LeBlanc

One of the two protagonists, Marie-Laure LeBlanc is an inquisitive, intellectually adventurous girl.  She became blind at the age of six, but learns to adapt to this and continues to explore and discover.  For most of the novel, Marie-Laure is a teenager, but by the end of the novel she’s an old woman.  Marie-Laure is a warm, loving girl: at the beginning of the book, she loves her father, Daniel LeBlanc, before anyone else.  After 1941, when Daniel leads her to the seaside town of Saint-Malo, she becomes close with her great-uncle, Etienne LeBlanc and her cook, Madame Manec. Marie-Laure is capable of feats of great daring.  With Daniel’s help, she trains herself to walk through large cities using only her cane, and when the conflict between France and Germany escalates, she volunteers to participate in the French resistance. In spite of the joy, she gets from reading and exploring, Marie-Laure’s life is full of tragedy: the people she loves most disappear from her life, beginning with her father.  As she grows older and becomes a scientist of molluscs, Marie-Laure comes to appreciate the paradox of her life: while she sometimes wants to be as stoic and “closed up” as the clams and whelks she studies, she secretly desires to reconnect with her loved ones.

Werner Pfennig

Werner Pfennig is a young, intelligent German boy and one of the two protagonists.  Werner has whitish-blond hair, blue eyes, and is strikingly intelligent, so he seems like a model of the Nazis’ “Aryan ideal”—except that he has a stronger moral compass and a lesser sense of racial superiority than most of his peers.  During his adolescence, Werner is close with his sister, Jutta Pfennig, with whom he lives at an orphanage (their father died in a mining accident, and their mother’s fate is unknown).  As a respite from their oppressive surroundings, Werner and Jutta develop a love for science and the broadcasts they hear via their radio (broadcasts being made, unbeknownst to either of them, by Marie’s own grandfather Henri).  As Werner grows older, he develops an aptitude for engineering and science, but is morally challenged when he is accepted into Schulpforta (a prestigious Nazi school) and then during his stint in the German army.  Werner uses his skills to help Volkheimer and other soldiers murder hundreds of people—some of them civilians—and wonders, again and again, if he’ll be able to live with his choices.  Throughout his time in the army, Werner remains devoted to his sister, Jutta, and often thinks back to their carefree days together in the orphanage.  His favourite memory of Jutta—listening to radio broadcasts in the orphanage—ultimately contributes to his decision to spare Marie-Laure’s life when he realizes that she is connected to these broadcasts.

Daniel LeBlanc

Marie Laure’s father, Daniel LeBlanc, is selflessly devoted to his daughter—indeed, he spends long hours teaching her Braille and crafting elaborate models of Paris (and later Saint-Malo) to teach her how to walk through the city without her eyesight. In general, Daniel is clever and good with his hands—a talent that makes him an accomplished locksmith at the Museum of Natural History before he’s forced to flee the Germans along with his daughter.  Because his employers at the Museum have tasked him with the protection of a priceless diamond, the Sea of Flames, Daniel leaves his daughter in Saint-Malo, is later imprisoned, and eventually dies of influenza.  Daniel’s absence in Marie-Laure’s life is one of the defining and most tragic themes of the novel—a sign of their sincere love for one another.

Frank Volkheimer

Frank Volkheimer is the huge, intimidating, and morally ambiguous staff sergeant who works as an assistant at Werner’s school, the National Institute, and later commands Werner through his time in the German army.  He can be tough and cruel, especially with prisoners of the German army, but he’s always gentle with Werner, and saves Werner’s life on more than one occasion.  It’s left unclear how loyal Volkheimer is to the German army—it’s suggested that he’s willing to ignore orders from his commanders because he values his friendship with Werner more highly.  In spite of his sins during World War II, Volkheimer is arguably “good” at heart, and his loyalty to Werner motivates much of the action in the final 100 pages of the book.  At the end of the war, he is left a shell of his former self and like Frederick represents a victim of the damage war does when he is haunted by his wartime experiences and lives a life subjected to PTSD.

Jutta Pfennig

Werner’s beloved sister Jutta is the moral constant against which Werner measures his own sins.  Jutta is intelligent, loving and artistic and has a well-developed sense of moral decency that enables her, even from a young age, to see through the German war propaganda and question the rightness of the country’s actions in ways others do not.  This means that even when Werner is recruited for the prestigious Nazi school Schulpforta.  Jutta is disgusted and when he’s sent off to fight in the Nazi army, she fears he will develop a dangerous loyalty to Nazi Germany.  Nevertheless, Jutta and Werner remain extremely close with one another, and throughout World War II, they think of each other and remember their carefree days as children through memories and letters.  Years after Werner’s death, Jutta continues to love and remember her brother, and his lasting influence leads her to eventually make contact with Marie-Laure.

Frau Elena

Frau Elena is the head of the orphanage where Jutta and Werner grow up.  She’s a gentle, kind woman, and treats all her children well like a mother figure, despite a severe lack of resources.  When the Nazis rise to power in Germany, she’s bullied for being a Frenchwoman—but her decision to teach all her children to speak French leads (years later) to the thematic centre of the novel: the encounter between Werner and Marie-Laure in Saint-Malo.  She bolsters Werner’s self esteem by believing in him thinking ‘you’ll do something great’ in the future. 

Great Uncle Etienne LeBlanc

Etienne LeBlanc is an old, eccentric, and extremely reclusive (it’s implied he has post-traumatic stress disorder from World War I) man who lives in the seaside town of Saint-Malo, France.  When his nephew, Daniel LeBlanc, and his grandniece, Marie-Laure, come to live with him following the Nazi invasion of Paris, he becomes close with Marie-Laure, often spending long chunks of time reading books to her.  As time passes, Marie-Laure’s courage inspires Etienne to take his own actions against the German soldiers, and he bravely aids the French resistance by broadcasting important information about the German troops on his radio.  Etienne’s love for Marie-Laure is confirmed when, frightened that she’s been arrested, he overcomes his terror of going outside and rushes out of his house to find her. He later tells his grandniece, “You’re the best thing that has ever happened to me.”

Frederick

Frederick is a fellow cadet with Werner at Schulpforta and they become friends.  He demonstrates a mix of character traits, is patriotic and loyal to the Fuhrer and the Nazi cause and believes it is right to be at the school but at the same time he does disobey an order that he considers morally wrong.  When he refuses to throw water on a prisoner, he represents a person with a strong conscience than any of the other students and does not retaliate when he is selected as the weakest of the group and punished with floggings at the hands of the teachers and fellow students.  He inspires Werner to consider standing up against the regime but in the end, he receives injuries at the hands of his peers that ensure he will never function again normally, brain damaged and in need of care from his mother.  He represents a moral character and like many others is a victim of the damage of the Nazi regime during the war.

Madame Manec

Worked for the LeBlancs since Etienne was a child.  She is kind, insightful, dedicated, generous and warm and develops a strong relationship with Marie-Laure.  She is actively involved in the French Resistance encouraging Etienne to become involved.  She is one of the characters that Doerr considers is a strong person who put themselves at risk to oppose the German occupation of France.  The novel shows that all kinds of people could find ways of fighting against the Nazis and remain loyal to France.

Sergeant Major Reinhold von Rumpel

His motivation is to locate the real Sea of Flames in the hope that it will cure his cancer and give him immortality.  He chases his target unrelentingly and later in the besieged city of Saint-Malo he waits in Marie’s house but Werner kills him and saves Marie.  He represents the evil of the Nazi regime and the destructive nature of war where great art works and culture was looted by the Nazi’s for their own personal gain.

Themes & Symbols
War, destruction, victims & perpetratorsNazi Regime & propagandaOccupation of France & French Resistance
FateFree willPride, duty, loyalty & nationalism
Family loyalty & loveScience & logicSight, ways of seeing & perception
BlindnessMemoriesMorality & integrity
Conformity & resistanceWeakness & strengthPurpose & belonging
HumanityHopeLight & dark
Hitler Youth & loyalty to FuhrerSea of FlamesModels of Paris & Saint-Malo
Whelks, Molluscs & ShellsRadioPower of art, artefacts & culture

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum

Never Let Me Go and Things We Didn’t See Coming Comparative Texts

See the source image
Things We Didn't See Coming - Steven Amsterdam

This Resource is for students in Year 12 studying ‘Never Let Me Go’ in comparison to ‘Things We Didn’t See Coming’ in AOS1: Unit 4, Reading & Comparing Texts, Analytical Text Response, in the Victorian VCE 2023 Mainstream English Curriculum

Introduction

Novels ‘Never Let Me Go’, by Kazuo Ishiguro (2005), and ‘Things We Didn’t See Coming’, by Steven Amsterdam (2009), offer thought-provoking views into alternative realities so close to our world that the parallels are obvious.  Advances in medical treatments through gene therapy, and experimentation with cloning, are current issues where technological capability is, at times, ahead of the ethical considerations and restraints.  Similarly, the Covid-19 pandemic, the environmental impact of climate change, the rise of oppressive political regimes, and the divide between the ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ are also much-debated topics in our own society.

Why Compare these 2 Texts?

Whilst these are two quite different novels, they both have young first-person protagonists who are exploring the worlds in which they live, searching for meaning and exploring their identities within this context.  They form close friendships, fall in love, and create a sense of family and belonging.  They also face loss, betrayal, and existential crises of a very real kind.

Speculative/Sci-fi or Dystopian Fiction?

Set in a parallel present or recent past, both novels can be categorised as speculative, sci-fi or dystopian fiction.  The societies created in each text are recognisable to readers, even quite ordinary in the case of ‘Never Let Me Go’, but with a twist that jolts readers to question occurrences that might have once seemed acceptable by giving us a different viewpoint.  In the case of ‘Things We Didn’t See Coming’, we start somewhere familiar (Y2K panic) then are soon catapulted into an environmental catastrophe and a pandemic (Covid-19 or plague similarities) —although not beyond the bounds of belief—and the resulting social and political chaos.  As with most speculative fiction, the texts ask ‘what if…?’ and try to answer it with their narratives.

Both Question Survival

Each text leads us to question what we are prepared to do to ensure our survival, collectively and individually.  Both novelists position readers to see that human beings will ignore what they know is right, that they will bend their values and change their moral belief systems to get what they want, or need, to survive.  Would you be prepared to steal, lie and cheat to meet you and your family’s needs? Would you be prepared to sacrifice the lives of other beings for your own?

What Makes us Human?

The novels, however, also come back to ideas about what makes us human.  What is the essence of our ‘humanness’?  They both suggest that what humans need above all is to belong, to find a tribe to protect them and to know who they are.  Most times, these tribes are beneficial, but they can also be exclusive, divisive and threatening.  The texts offer views of each of these.  Mostly, however, each novel shows the importance of family or the need to belong to a family by whatever definition you give to this.

How much can we Control?

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, many of us have come to recognise that we can only control what we can control.  Both of these novels celebrate this idea.  Whilst the characters cannot control everything around them, what they do show is their resilience, their ability to adapt and change like the narrator of ‘Things We Didn’t See Coming’, or their ability to find the positives in the people around them like Kathy in ‘Never Let Me Go’.  This is all we can control.

Narrative Perspective & Style

Both have 1st Person Perspective of the Protagonist

Both novels are written in the first person, from the perspective of the protagonist.  Amsterdam’s unnamed narrator relates events in a fairly straightforward manner with not a great deal of internal monologue.  The dialogue is narrated as it happens, and is often direct dialogue, related without any commentary from the narrator.  It is written in the present tense and the readers are positioned to feel a close affinity with the narrator as he progresses through episodes of his life.  Perhaps because of the nature of the discontinuous episodic structure, he is rarely shown to think back over his life to past events.  Readers observe the way that the pragmatic narrator moves forward to deal with the next thing and then the next.

Contrastingly, readers meet Ishiguro’s narrator, thirty-one-year-old Kathy H. at a crucial moment in her life and in a state of emotional reflection, and all that is revealed is filtered through her memories. Written in the past tense, in a nonlinear time scale of memories Kathy uses a conversational and colloquial tone with use of analepsis (flashbacks) and prolepsis (flash forwards).  However, the novel often positions readers to feel less sure of the accuracy of the naïve Kathy’s interpretation of the people and events of her past.  In a sense, even though Kathy is recalling her own past, the author makes it clear that she is, at times, an unreliable narrator.  Her interpretation of Ruth’s motives, for example, are somewhat naïve.  Further, Ishiguro sometimes gives us Tommy’s dialogue as a differing perspective, but this perspective is also filtered through Kathy’s fond memories.  The narration of ‘Never Let Me Go’ is complex and invites further consideration as do the writer’s intention.

Structure & Questions in ‘Things We Didn’t See Coming’

In ‘Things We Didn’t See Coming’, the episodic structure of 9 stories /discontinuous narrative/ gaps can make it a frustrating read for those readers who might want a continuous narrative with neat resolutions.  The first story ‘What We Know Now’ takes place on December 31, 1999 and the other stories are progressively later.  For the most part, each new chapter opens a new episode without any reference to the events or people who were in the previous one.

The novel asks a number of ‘what if’ questions which it attempts to answer:

  • What if climate change immediately impacted our country?
  • What if the country and city divide became political?
  • What if the planet was overcome by a plague of insects?
  • What if a virus wiped out the majority of the population?
CHARACTERS IN ‘THINGS WE DIDN’T SEE COMING’
Unnamed narrator/protagonist in all 9 storiesOtis narrator’s father in ‘What We Know Now’ & ‘Best Medicine’ storiesCate narrator’s mother in ‘What We Know Now’ story
The grandparents of narrator in ‘What We Know Now’ & ‘The Theft That Got Me Here’ storiesLiz & Jenna are mother and daughter who protagonist meets in ‘Dry Land’ storyMargo is narrator’s love interest in ‘Cakewalk’, ‘Uses for Vinegar’& ‘The Forest for the Trees’ stories
Juliet is corrupt politician in ‘The Forest for the Trees’ storyJeph 14-year-old orphan who has the narrator as a guardian in ‘Predisposed’ storyKaruna interviews narrator in ‘The Profit Motive’ story

Structure & Questions in ‘Never Let Me Go’

In ‘Never Let Me Go’ the novel is divided into 3 parts, with further chapter divisions.  Part 1, chapters 1-9 is set in Hailsham.  Part 2, chapters 10-17 is Life after Hailsham.  Part 3, chapters 18-23 is Kathy’s life as a carer.  The novel starts in ‘England, late 1990’s’ following narrator Kathy H. as a thirty-one-year-old carer who is about to become a donor and explores her memories of the past. 

The novel asks a number of ‘what if’ questions which it asks the readers to consider their answers:

  • What makes us human?
  • What rights must all humans have?
  • What does an individual ‘owe’ society?
  • How we live our lives in order for it to be meaningful?
  • Why we should fight to ensure equality amongst all humans?
  • Why is organ trafficking unethical?
  • Is human cloning the future or is it unethical, just playing God?
CHARACTERS IN ‘NEVER LET ME GO’
Kathy H. narrator/protagonistRuth best friend of Kathy at HailshamTommy student at Hailsham/has relationship with Ruth & later Kathy
Chrissie & Rodney veterans of the CottagesMiss Lucy guardian at HailshamMiss Emily head guardian at Hailsham
Madame Marie-Claude founder of Hailsham and collects creative work of students for her galleryMiss Geraldine guardian at HailshamKeffers looks after maintenance at The Cottages
COMPARISON THEMES IN BOTH TEXTS
dystopian societyhumanity & compassionhuman nature
forms of power & controlconformity & acceptancesurvival
identity & freedomdangers of technologyInformation & knowledge
love & friendshipfamilyfear, hope & despair
empathy & compassionimpact of politics on peoplebildungsroman
love & relationshipspersonal agencymemory, the past & time
fate, free will & choicescience without ethicsindividual versus society
science fiction versus realismmanipulation of truthexploitation & inequality
constant surveillancedehumanisationcorporate domination
KEY CONCEPTIDEAS FROM NEVER LET ME GOIDEAS FROM THINGS WE DIDN’T SEE COMINGENRICHED UNDERSTANDING OF THE KEY CONCEPT
The Importance of ConnectionThe students support each other through childhoodThey drift apart in adulthoodThey revisit their close bonds when the donations beginRelationships can sometimes be destructiveWe need connection to others to surviveAt the end of our lives, connection mattersWhile we may drift apart from those we love over the course of our lives, both authors emphasise the importance of connections during hard times
Memories & The PresentThe past can be a refugeThe details of the past can be hazyWe can get trapped in our memoriesThe past can be irrelevant, or at worst, a burdenThe present is what matters  While memories of the past can offer us safety and comfort, they cannot protect us from the present or our futures
Power & ControlPower structures exist that keep people in their place in societyThere is little point in struggling for controlPower structures are ambiguous and temporaryWe have control over our own lives  In the face of ever-changing and increasingly authoritarian power structures, the only control we have is over how we live our lives
Ethics & MoralityIn the future we will be forced to make increasingly difficult ethical choicesWhat is a life worth?What is human?Difficult circumstances lead to tough moral decisionsThere is rarely any clear ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ for every situationBoth authors reveal how difficult moral and ethical situations impact entire nations and individuals
Hope & DespairThe clones are capable of hope despite the knowledge of their fatesHumans are hopeful, even in the face of impending deathSome people fear the future and they may be proved rightSome people are willing to do whatever it takes to surviveIn the face of our mortality, both authors demonstrate that life is filled with moments of both hope and despair

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum

Legacy and Message of Author Christine Piper in ‘After Darkness’

For Year 12 Mainstream English Students studying the VCE Curriculum ‘After Darkness’ by Christine Piper, these resources are useful as revision of ‘Legacy and Message of Author’ which is critical for you to include in analytical essays.

After Darkness by Christine Piper.

‘Historical Amnesia’

The two nations that figure in Piper’s novel, Japan and Australia, were enemies in WWII, yet the ‘war’ is merely a backdrop to the narrative’s ideas.  Piper interrogates two cases of ‘historical amnesia’.  In Japan, a national reluctance to acknowledge and investigate the cruel testing on live humans of biological weapons by its Army Medical College in China in the 1930’s.  In Australia, a silence about internment of ‘enemy aliens’.

Atonement

When dark things have been done in the name of any nation, there is a national decision or choice to be made, either to acknowledge the wrong and reconcile with the victims, a form of atonement or contrition [remorse] that is likely to ‘release’ perpetrators from their sense of guilt.  Or to keep silent and pretend that the immoral or unethical actions did not happen.  In Germany after WWII there were the Nuremberg trials and a long process of acknowledging the nation’s dark history.  However, in Japan there were no such trials, and authorities have been reluctant to acknowledge atrocities.  The contradiction between Japanese memory of wartime past is a struggle between forgetting and remembrance, tradition and progression.  

National Identity, memory, forgetting merge with individual identity and belonging

The novel questions national identity, memory and forgetting that merge with questions about individual identity and belonging.  Piper suggests that this conflicted Japanese war memory is personified in Dr Ibaraki, whose psychological struggle with his conscience, his sense of duty and his memories about his time at the Laboratory in Tokyo echoes Japan’s wider struggle to reconcile its three wartime identities of atomic bomb victim, protector of Asia and cruel aggressor.

National pride and national self-respect

The larger idea here is that there is a difference between national pride and national self-respect.  A self-respecting nation can acknowledge cruelty and violence perpetrated in its name, whereas an overdeveloped sense of national identity, national pride taken to extremes of insensitivity, indifference and sometimes contempt for the rights of the people of other states and nations, can generate, intensify and prolong deadly conflict.

Coercive notions of conformity, discretion & secrecy

Piper shows how coercive notions of conformity, discretion and secrecy can intensify and prolong conflict and cruelty, and how these can lead to shame and guilt for the perpetrators and rebellion or depression for the victims.  Piper explores, how the bones of Shinjuku are still silent, waiting to reveal their truth.  By not investigating the bones by Japanese authorities, is a failure to confront the truth about Japanese history, a denial of the past, a pretence, whereas investigating the bones is an act of coming to terms with the nation’s past, and an act of contrition and honesty.

Conflict of culture between personal feelings and public façade

Piper outlines in her novel the conflict between personal feelings (hone) and public façade (tatemae) which can lead to people being so restrained, reserved and discreet, that they do not have the courage and personal agency to speak up against corrupt superiors, nor to reconcile and forgive.  We see this contrast between the Japanese character of Dr Ibaraki who is exhorted [urged] by his superiors in Tokyo to be discreet and to take the secret of the Laboratory “to the grave” so he keeps his inner feelings to himself throughout his time and aims not to bring shame upon his family.  But the character of Johnny Chang, a half-caste Australian/Japanese, is a personable character ready to stand up for himself and his mates, with an assertiveness like rebellion, but he is honest and openly challenges the power, corruption and cruelty he sees in wartime Australia and at Loveday.

Piper’s play of light and darkness & the title

Piper’s descriptions of the light and darkness of Australian landscapes convey to the reader her ideas about the moral dilemmas that challenge both nation and individual.  Australia’s silence about incarcerating people can be seen in the dead trees “I glimpsed the contours of a wide river, its surface glittering white.  Dead trees haunted its edges, their limbs stretching skywards, as if begging for forgiveness (p.3).  She also describes the threat of Japan’s moral compromise in “a thick bank of clouds” as an overcast day throws “sombre light on … Kimura’s face” (p.120). 

The novel’s title seems to pose the question: What comes after the darkness?  Piper implies that the light of truth, honesty, openness, reconciliation and forgiveness comes after the darkness.  That to journey from one to the other, we must remember rather than forget, and share ourselves with others rather than withhold ourselves in secrecy or silence.

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum

‘After Darkness’ by Christine Piper a Brief Synopsis

Image result for after darkness by christine piper book cover

This Resource is ‘A Brief Synopsis’ only for Mainstream English Year 12 Students studying After Darkness by Christine Piper AOS1 Unit 3 Analytical Study in the VCE Victorian Curriculum.

Read my other Post on ‘Legacy and Message of Author’ as the two Posts link up.

Christine Piper’s historical fiction, After Darkness deals with suppressed fragments of the past and silenced memories.  The protagonist, Dr Ibaraki attempts to move forward with life whilst also trying to hide past confrontations as well as any remnants of his past wrongdoings and memories.  The novel chronicles 2 journeys – the first is Ibaraki’s physical journey from Japan to Broome, to South Australia and back to Japan.  In the process, the young doctor undertakes a second, more private journey towards a greater understanding of self.  What begins as escape from his past ends as an opportunity to redeem it.

See the source image

Piper’s Message of Author is clear here – Ibaraki learns the notions of duty that have been inculcated [taught] from boyhood are less important than values such as empathy, forgiveness and the courage to speak out in the face of blatant immorality.  The relationships Ibaraki forms during his exile, particularly at Loveday, are critical to this metamorphosis [transformation].  Therefore, the novel is a story of personal growth that charts the psychological and moral growth of the protagonist.

The text consists of three intertwined narrative strands

  1. Ibaraki’s past in Tokyo in 1934
  2. His arrival in Broome in 1938 to work in a hospital there, and
  3. His arrival in a detainment camp in Loveday (South Australia) in 1942 after the outbreak of WW2.

The final chapter Tokyo 1989 concludes Ibaraki’s story, moving into the present tense to describe his life as an elderly man living in Tokyo.  Now in his 80’s he has to face the guilt of his past by writing a letter to the media which resolves the conflict between his conscience and the cultural values that have silenced his voice for so many years.  In a way everything in Ibaraki’s life has been leading to this moment.

Structure – Importance of Place

By moving between the 3 settings Piper emphasises the importance of place.  Each setting plays a critical role in Ibaraki’s emotional journey.  The chapters set in these different times and places are linked in that ideas or patterns of behaviour explored in one chapter, feed into the next.  Within each setting, events move inexorably [inevitably] towards a climax that marks an important turning point in Ibaraki’s life.  This structure enables the protagonist to look back on events with the hindsight imposed by time and distance, allowing Ibaraki to evaluate his choices and learn from past mistakes.

Historical Context of the Text

Piper draws on real events that occurred in Japan and Australia before and during WW2.  The most infamous part of the historical context is Unit 731, a covert [secret] medical research branch of the Imperial Japanese Army.  The young Dr Ibaraki is caught up in this research, where victims from Manchuria were injected with bubonic plague, typhoid, anthrax, cholera and other deadly pathogens, vivisections were conducted, without anaesthetic, to determine the progress of the diseases.  For many years the Japanese Government suppressed the truth of these horrific crimes.  It was not until 1989 that mass graves of bones were discovered in Shinjuku district of Tokyo.  Local residents fought official attempts to shut down investigations but gradually the facts about the horror started to emerge.

Language Devices

Piper writes in expressive, controlled prose and uses imagery, simile, metaphor, personification, foreshadowing that not only establish context but also delineate Ibaraki’s relationship to the landscape.  Often the imagery reflects his emotional state either directly or subliminally [subconsciously].

Language Devices Examples

Page Language Quote Explanation
1 Sense of place & colour imagery of landscape “The sun spread on the horizon, bleeding colour like a broken yolk” Ibaraki abandons his customary restraint to describe what he sees around him evokes a strong sense of place
46 Colour imagery of landscape “A pink spur of land crested with green rose out of the milky blue water” At first sight of Broome Ibaraki is struck by the unexpected colours
46 Colour imagery of landscape “a curve of rich red sand that bled into the azure sea” Broome is a strange clash of colours nothing like Ibaraki had ever seen in Japan
125 Colour imagery & nature “…the birds of paradise …spear shaped orange and blue petals perfectly encapsulate Broome’s hostile beauty” Juxtaposing the open beak of a bird represented by the bird of paradise plant is both hostile and beautiful
3 Landscape imagery that delineates Ibaraki’s emotional state “…. Haunted its edges, their limbs stretching skywards, as if begging for forgiveness” Travelling to Loveday by train Ibaraki passes a river flanked by dead trees the image hints at the guilt that haunts Ibaraki
198 foreshadowing “snow was falling as I walked home from the station – the first snow of the season” Foreshadowing the storm about to come in his life
174 foreshadowing “the rust coloured arc made me think of the transience of life.  And how with just one ill wind, everything could change” Foreshadowing trauma to come the fine red desert dirt is a reminder of life transience that everything can change & imminent crisis
13 Simile & Landscape imagery that delineates Ibaraki’s emotional state “… like blistered skin” Beside the camp Ibaraki sees a row of red gums with bark peeling from their trunks reminds him of the corrupted flesh of the victims in Unit 731 from Ibaraki’s past
204 Imagery of light and darkness Plunged into “darkness” Images of light and darkness are woven through the text, juxtaposing Ibaraki’s experiences in Tokyo with those in Australia.  After his marriage fails, he is plunged into darkness
45 Imagery of darkness that delineates Ibaraki’s emotional state “I was glad for the pocket of darkness that hid my tears” Ibaraki does not share the nationalistic fervour of the other Japanese when Broome is bombed instead, he mourns the destruction of the town and concern for former friends left behind
274 Imagery of light and darkness Broome is a “vivid wash of light” Comparing to the darkness he felt in Japan, Broome is a bright light, suggesting that things have become clearer during his time in Australia
Title metaphor “After Darkness” Darkness in the title acts as a metaphor for WW2 and the horror that affects nations and individuals alike.

The darkness also suggests the moral darkness that implicated Japan of committing war crimes on innocent people in Unit 731 representing the depths of depravity they reached.

After the darkness of war, the Japanese nation and individuals involved must make peace with themselves by coming to terms with their past.

Ibaraki writing a letter to the press exposes the darkness of Unit 731 to the light.  Moral doubt and secrecy are replaced by moral clarity.

In Piper’s novel issues associated with Identity / Culture / Place underpin dilemmas about Truth / Lies / Secrecy / Openness / Honesty / Discretion / Guilt / Failure / Forgiveness & Renewal

Race & Identity, Racism vs Nationalism

The fraught relationship between race & identity is seen at individual & national levels.  Physical hatred, fear and paranoia of the Japanese interned in Australia is a clear result of the war.  Other differences are characters who do not fit one race or the other as half castes.  The fenced off divide in the camp between the Japanese, Italians & Germans highlights segregation.

Duty

Characters are motivated by a sense of duty, beliefs & misconceptions about what this entails provide the moral tension at the heart of the novel.  Ibaraki grew up with the weight of family expectations on him to be a doctor.

During his time at the lab he faces a conflict between his conscience and sense of duty that has been underlined all his life.  Saving face and not bringing dishonour and shame on oneself or family is the dilemma Ibaraki faces regarding the work in Unit 731.  But his greatest betrayal is to himself, not speaking out against the evil.

Choices

The overarching context of war determines the destinies of many of the characters in the text, exerting a crucial influence on the ways in which personal stories are played out.  Ibaraki understands many of his choices have been driven by fear and his notions of duty and honour over conscience or love and as a result all his personal relationships have suffered as a result.

Loss

The text highlights the effect of men who find themselves classified as enemy aliens.  The text also explores the idea of displacement when Ibaraki loses his job and marriage, he also loses his sense of belonging.

Guilt & Atonement

Working at the research unit in Tokyo Ibaraki naively thinks he is working to develop vaccines for good purposes but the opposite is the reality.  This horrific past remains a wound that is impossible to forget.  By exposing the truth in the 1980’s he redeems himself.

Silence, Keeping Secrets & Loneliness

The theme of silence is prevalent in the novel.  Kimura threatens Ibaraki never to talk about the work in the lab.  He hides secrets all through his life leaving him lonely.  Piper stresses that opening up to people you care about is the way to maintain healthy relationships with mutual trust.

Past vs Present – concept of time

The dichotomy of past and present is encapsulated through the passing of time in the text mirrored with the three narrative strands and transformations in the environment as well as characters.  Piper alludes to the fact that the present is impacted by the past.

Friendship

Piper exults the power of friendships formulated in life makes undergoing bad circumstances much better.  Friends understand one another on an emotional level and provide support needed.

Personal Conscience, Regret & Shame

Personal conscience is a prominent theme that humanises the regrets and mistakes one can make in their life.  Ibaraki pushes people away in order to realise that it makes the feeling of guilt and pain return.  Piper considers the necessity to speak your mind when a problem arises as the detriments that could occur afterwards can cause guilt and shame to last a lifetime.

Hope

Piper postulates that hope can be a significant guiding force for an individual when they encounter difficult circumstances in life.  Some characters enable Ibaraki to be a better person such as Johnny and Stan and they give the support he needs to overcome obstacles in life.

All Resources created by englishtutorlessons.com.au Online Tutoring using Zoom for Mainstream English Students in the Victorian Curriculum